2018 California Pro - Men's Open Bodybuilding

2018 California Pro

2018 California Pro

Date:
Saturday, May 26th, 2018
Location:
Culver City, California
Federation:
IFBB
Class:

Men's Open Bodybuilding

Competitors:
Status:
Event Complete
Other Results:

Fantasy:
N/A

Men's Open Bodybuilding Results

#1

Nathan De Asha (United Kingdom)
Judging
Finals
Total
5pts
5pts
10pts

#2

Sasan Heirati (United Kingdom)
Judging
Finals
Total
11pts
10pts
21pts

#3

Rafael Brandao (Brazil)
Judging
Finals
Total
14pts
15pts
29pts

#4

Josh Wade (USA)
Judging
Finals
Total
24pts
20pts
44pts

#5

Lionel Beyeke (France)
Judging
Finals
Total
27pts
25pts
52pts

#6

Milan Sadek (Czech Republic)
Judging
Finals
Total
27pts
31pts
58pts

#7

Gerald Williams (USA)
Judging
Finals
Total
32pts
34pts
66pts

#8

Patrick Moore (USA)
Judging
Finals
Total
42pts
40pts
82pts

#9

Eddie Bracamontes (USA)
Judging
Finals
Total
43pts
46pts
89pts

#10

Kevin Jordan (USA)
Judging
Finals
Total
52pts
54pts
106pts
2018 California Pro - Men's Open Bodybuilding

2018 California Pro

Men's Open Bodybuilding

#1

Nathan De Asha (United Kingdom)
Judging
Finals
Total
5pts
5pts
10pts

#2

Sasan Heirati (United Kingdom)
Judging
Finals
Total
11pts
10pts
21pts

#3

Rafael Brandao (Brazil)
Judging
Finals
Total
14pts
15pts
29pts

#4

Josh Wade (USA)
Judging
Finals
Total
24pts
20pts
44pts

#5

Lionel Beyeke (France)
Judging
Finals
Total
27pts
25pts
52pts

#6

Milan Sadek (Czech Republic)
Judging
Finals
Total
27pts
31pts
58pts

#7

Gerald Williams (USA)
Judging
Finals
Total
32pts
34pts
66pts

#8

Patrick Moore (USA)
Judging
Finals
Total
42pts
40pts
82pts

#9

Eddie Bracamontes (USA)
Judging
Finals
Total
43pts
46pts
89pts

#10

Kevin Jordan (USA)
Judging
Finals
Total
52pts
54pts
106pts

Other Results:
Date:
Saturday, May 26th, 2018
Location:
Culver City, California
Federation:
IFBB
Class:
Men's Open Bodybuilding
Competitors:
Status:
Event Complete
Other Results:
Copyright Bodybuildingpicks 2023.

Accuracy of data.

Instagram @bodybuildingpicks
Copyright Bodybuildingpicks 2023.

Accuracy of data.